Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Survival Guide

A Patronizing Colleague

February 18, 2011

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Dear Survival Guide:

I am an associate dean in a liberal arts college in a large public university. I am the only woman, apart from the dean herself, on the team. One of my colleagues, with whom I have to work quite closely, is rather self-important, constantly mentioning his connections, the importance of his role, his attendance at key meetings, and how very busy he is. I just get on with my job, which I believe I am doing well. Each time I have to collaborate with this colleague, I have a sense that he is either telling me what to do, telling me what a good job I am doing (but in an evaluative tone), not listening to the key ideas I am presenting and often resisting these, pushing his own agenda, or otherwise patronizing me.

I am younger than he is by more than 20 years, and a woman, and I am also considerably more experienced administratively. I am by nature quite easygoing, but this is beginning to affect my working relationships and my personal well-being. I have thought of tackling the matter directly with him, but each time I raise a small question about our interactions, he just spouts a string of compliments that disarm me whenever I criticize him. In public, I find his remarks intolerable, but I do not want to discredit him in these arenas, so I put up with it even as I feel it does a disservice to me, my colleagues, and my area of responsibility. My dean is aware of the situation and is supportive, but I feel that the responsibility lies with me to address this situation.

--Tired of Being Put Down

Dear Tired:

I wish I had the perfect, or even a very good, answer for you. Maybe some of our readers will. My two main pieces of advice may sound familiar: first, success is the best revenge, and second, the only thing you get to change in this situation is you. This means that the strongest response that will leave you in the best situation long-term is to stick with your strategy of getting on with your job and make sure that your work is of the top quality, responsive to your dean’s needs and advancing the good of the college. Developing a selective deafness as to your colleague’s remarks and his tone might also help get through what is likely to continue being unpleasant.

As I see it, your dean may feel that she is being supportive, but by leaving the entire situation to you to handle, she has effectively sent you out on a limb by yourself. Just about anything you say in these situations, either in public or private, will be turned against you: you’re too sensitive, you’re reading things into the situation that are not there, you’re paranoid, you are too touchy, etc. Many of these comments are likely to be delivered in the same patronizing tone that is already bothering you.

It does occur to me that maybe the dean doesn’t know what to do that would make the situation any better and is too nice or too conflict averse to suggest you are being too thin-skinned. Or, it is possible that the dean sees the conduct, and is happy that the colleague is being patronizing to you and not to her. I respect your sense that this is up to you to handle; at the same time, you said your dean is supportive. A well-placed positive-about-your work comment from the dean in one of the public situations could help considerably and would not require her to deal with any outright conflict; whether he is insecure or more Machiavellian in what he is trying to do, her endorsement of you and your work might give him a different perspective on how the winds are blowing.

Test the situation by suggesting a phrase of endorsement she might drop into one of the public conversations when he is present about your work. Whatever the dean’s rationale or how this plays out, the only aspect of this situation that you get to change is you, not how your colleague behaves. One thing to consider is whether the compliments are indeed sincere. What is the chance that he’s simply terrible at ordinary interactions? For example, is the patronizing tone unique to his interactions with you, or does he talk down to everyone? To assess whether his conduct is targeted only at you, focus on others while he is talking: what kinds of reactions does he elicit? Is there eye-rolling or subtle or overt signals through body language or speech indicating that others are irritated, too? If it’s the latter, growing a thicker skin -- or training yourself not to notice his style of speaking -- may be your best defense.

Try to assess whether your colleague’s insecurities may be driving him to try to put you down, whether overtly or subtly. If so, then your best bet is to find effective coping mechanisms. If his tone and approach are special for you, the chances are good that others are noticing it, too, and your high-road, non-response will affect your reputation far more than anything he does -- particularly over time. Whether your colleague’s comments are targeted at you or are generally characteristic of his interaction style, one possible way to divert yourself is to start keeping a log. For starters, track what he says, the target, the setting/type of meeting, who else is present, and time of day, for starters, to see if you can find a pattern. If you see one, that could provide a key for devising an intervention that might improve the whole dynamic.

Even if it does not, keeping a log can be a strong coping mechanism for situations in which you have minimal control over what is otherwise happening: It gives you something concrete to do and something else to think about while he blathers on. When I had a scary major surgery some years back to remove a large brain tumor (thankfully benign), neither I nor my family had much control over how events unfolded. We adopted the logging approach, deciding to track five specific behaviors on the part of medical personnel with whom we interacted (eye contact, hand washing, etc.). Our record-keeping did not reduce how frightening the situation was, but it situated us more firmly in who we were and provided us with a structured activity and something to think and talk about with each other. As a bonus, at the end, we had some interesting data for a letter to the hospital CEO about the experience of being a patient in that environment with some suggestions for his consideration. We got this idea from Atul Gawande’s book Better, in which he provides five suggestions for being a positive deviant, for making a worthy difference. Suggestion three is “count something” to become a scientist in the world. So count we did.

--Survival Guide

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Patronizing Colleague

  • Resources on defending against verbal attacks
  • Posted by Cecelia Munzenmaier on February 18, 2011 at 1:15pm UTC
  • Suzette Haden Elgin's books on verbal self-defense could be helpful. You can get an overview of her Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense system at http://www.adrr.com/aa/

    The CrucialSkills newsletter also provides sound, nuanced advice on touchy workplace situations: http://www.crucialskills.com/category/kerrying-on/
  • Another point of view
  • Posted by Will Hochman , Professor of English at SCSU on February 18, 2011 at 2:45pm UTC
  • It sounds like the colleague of "Tired of being putting down"is successful and likes to brag about his work. If he's like me, he's worked hard to achieve success and guarded his time to fulfill his scholar and service roles while trying to be the best teacher he can. Except for dinky and corrupt school prizes, administrators don't always praise good work and value the time we take to make ourselves more professional and contribute to our field.

    Maybe "Tired of being putting down" is really someone who can do an administrative job but little else to distinguish herself? There are lots of those folks and I have observed this section of mediocre educators and administrators at every school I've worked (six and counting). Maybe "Tired of being putting down" doesn't deserve to be an ast.dean if she isn't able to display excellence in all working categories?
  • Posted by Concerned on February 18, 2011 at 3:00pm UTC
  • I suggest you look into the possibility that you are being bullied. In bullying situations it is best to document everything and try to get out of it as fast as possible because it can be very damaging to your work and health. There are lots of online and book resources on bullying which may be helpful. Good luck!
  • Posted by Ms. Administrator , Assistant Dean at UNC on February 18, 2011 at 3:30pm UTC
  • So Professor Hochman thinks that one cannot distinguish themselves by performing administrative work?

    There is definitely a caste system in higher ed and those of us who are senior administrators but do not teach are typically not regarded all that highly and it can come out in rather strange ways. So I certainly identify with "Tired of Being Put Down".

    Good administration is typically invisible to those who directly benefit from it. The only time anyone pays any attention to administrative affairs is when something is not done well. It take a lot of work to keep a large unit running smoothly. So the next time you get your paycheck or have some other need met without incident, you can thank an administrator for that.
  • Posted by Perry on February 18, 2011 at 4:30pm UTC
  • This is all from the perspective of the Assoc Dean and we hear nothing about how her colleague views the situation. It sounds like she has little respect for her colleague's accomplishments and doesn't like to listen to his suggestions. She sounds defensive about persisting in her own views and threatened by the accomplishments of others, which she denigrates here and no doubt ignores in her interactions with them. It is common in academia for administrators to believe that everyone is equal (except them) and thus no one's past experience or accomplishments are relevant in any situation. It doesn't actually make everyone equal. This woman wants to argue from authority and dislikes being one-upped by someone who disagrees with her, citing his past experience to support his positions. She can argue the merits of her own positions but perhaps those are not strong enough. This would be a total non-issue if she were not trying to impose her own views on others and objecting to their opposition. Why do some people believe that past experience is irrelevant and thus contributing based on one's past experience is bullying? I've never understood that.
  • welcome to academia
  • Posted by Been There on February 18, 2011 at 6:30pm UTC
  • I read this column three times to figure out where the "put downs" happened. I don't see them. This interpersonal dynamic strikes me as a fairly common tension between two people who both have insecurities about their position. The respondent is absolutely right that we can't stop someone from patronizing us (if indeed they are); we can only stop ourselves from feeling patronized.

    I've been there, done that, and this is how I resolved the situation. I was the female, new faculty member, entering a department with a store of expertise that overlapped an older male colleague. I was tenure-track, he was not, meaning in some ways I outranked him even then. He had just returned from an unsuccessful federal appointment and clearly felt threatened by my appearance.

    Today we work very amicably together, even co-teaching. The key? The second time he challenged my facts in an open meeting, I had data to back up my position, and I didn't back down or let him steamroll me. He developed some respect for my spine and my grasp of facts. To reciprocate, I found opportunities to praise his government experience in public, and looked for opportunities to consult him, whether or not I really needed to. I learned to respect the value he brings to my department, which is considerable.

    In a nutshell, every relationship is reciprocal. So long as this writer believes her colleague is a pebble in her shoe, she will overlook his need for validation. I expect that demonstrating public respect for what he DOES contribute will stop the negativity. But if it doesn't, why doesn't she borrow his strategy? If he has been disarming her by killing her with kindness, I suggest she try the same.
  • Patronizing
  • Posted by David , Chem on February 18, 2011 at 8:15pm UTC
  • Patronize: "to behave or talk in a way that shows you think you are more intelligent or important than someone else." What are people supposed to do, dumb themselves down in their interactions with you? If so would you then likely criticize him as being condescending toward you? To him you may seem very defensive and marginalizing of his position, age, and experience. No doubt he has his own constellation of battle scars earned when he was your age. This is part of life whether personal or professional and is inevitable for yourself as well. This is beginning to affect your personal well-being? Why have you turned over to someone your own responsibility for your personal well-being? I agree with you that yours is the responsibility to address this situation, but perhaps not according to your ways. Talking with him may result in an adjustment of both your attitude as well as his. As it is, perhaps you are trying to dominate the situation and control him and his behavior by expecting him to conform to your idea of what is proper.
  • Posted by Melissa Ianetta , Director of Writing / Assoc. Prof English at University of Delaware on February 18, 2011 at 8:15pm UTC
  • My two cents letter writer: Work hard, live well and know that being this guy is always its own punishment. If he's telling you how awesome he is, he's probably not feeling very high on himself for reasons probably too juvenile to merit attention. Don't bother fighting with him over what he thinks of you, because really, who cares?

    Oh, and outperform him. As long as you're successful and happy, whether it gets his goat or not, doesn't matter. Although, FWIW, this approach has always seemed to me the best method of goat-getting there is.

  • Try a Letter or E-Mail
  • Posted by Sandra L McGill on February 18, 2011 at 9:00pm UTC
  • Hi “Tired,”

    I agree with the author that the only person you can control in this situation is you, but I think there’s one more thing you might try. I’m a woman too, and from what I’ve heard from the men folk, they’re very simple when it comes to most things – i.e., they don’t read minds. (In other words, if you don’t tell them directly and specifically what’s on your mind, they’re not going to know.) So I would try confronting him one more time, but instead of doing it face-to-face, try a letter or an e-mail instead. This way he can’t interrupt you (which, from what you said, he’s done successfully in the past) and you can get out ALL of what you want to say to him.

    I’d also say in the letter that the Dean is aware of this situation – which is not an unreasonable thing to add, especially because the Dean said she supports you (even if she doesn’t show it in her actions). I would also Carbon-copy the Dean if you communicate with him via e-mail (not Blind-carbon-copy – the guy needs to see that you mean business) or, if you’re giving him a hard-copy letter, give one to the Dean, too – and let him know in the letter that you’ve done so. (And if you are going to go the e-mail route, it would be a good idea to print it out for future proof, just in case servers crash or whatever.) By referencing the Dean, you let him know quite well that if he continues in his behaviors, there are consequences higher up the chain of command. If, after this, he still decides to continue his actions, it’s on him, but he can’t say he wasn’t notified – so you’re off the hook if it should come to him saying “I never knew she felt this way.”

    This is a hard situation no matter which way you go and I don’t envy you. All the best.
  • Seriously? Still?
  • Posted by dmh , Professor, Communication & Women's Studies at ISU on February 19, 2011 at 1:15am UTC
  • First, I was disappointed to read that the best advice for a professional woman encountering bullyish (and boorish) and, in any case unprofessional, behavior by their peers in form of comments directed at her is to "grow a thicker skin." I appreciated the suggestion of tracking the behavior to determine if it is singularly personal to her or graciously shared with the community of peers this man encounters. But, then, it seemed the good outcome is to discover that others share the pain and so we can all roll our eyes at this guy together. If she discovers the behavior is directed at her alone, the answer is to assume she is provoking it. Seriously? Still? Then, I read the too many comments that retold this story and cast the woman asking for help as an incompentent administrator-only who must consistently fail to recognize her male peer's excellence causing him to announce it persistently (if not relentlessly). I appreciated the comments that sympathized. But I kept waiting for more. How about a candid recognition that no one in academia (faculty, staff, students) has managed to avoid this guy. And that this kind of behavior is on the list of those for which we refuse (or at least resist) holding ourselves accountable. Faculty complaints about student incivility are increasing so we conduct workshops about effective responses to incivility and they always stress that the behavior must be addressed and that effective strategies end incivility. Faculty incivility is tolerated, rationalized, excused, apologized for by others, narrativized into humorous stories that seem to think rude and mean-spirited comments brusquely delivered with the self-awareness of an inanimate object are somehow the same as other "charming eccentricities" sweetly associated with being an academic. I'm exhausted by the energy required to ignore what we should address. Katha Pollitt wrote in an eassy that each of us in our daily lives helps determine the limits of the permissible. We need to call each other on bad behavior; we need to speak when we are not the "target" and are in the room; we need to insist on civility in interactions; we need to require ourselves to respect the impact of our actions--rather than repeatedly reminding the world that we have a right to act badly, assuming we are neither responsible for nor the agent of our actions, or relying on our "targets" to develop calluses.
  • And in the real world...
  • Posted by A. M. Fraser on February 19, 2011 at 5:15pm UTC
  • One of the less fun realities of life is that we will all encounter people who behave in ways not to our liking. A less fun reality is that we will encounter people who find our personalities equally objectionable (and sometimes rightfully so). Some words and behaviors cross a line and require specific actions and processes. The majority, however, do not fall in this category. Learning how to manage our own conduct in interactions with unpleasant people in such a way as to minimize the extent to which the mission of the institution or group is affected by personal issues is one of the most useful skills an administrator (or anyone else for that matter) can develop. People who are able to master this skill are highly sought after, which is the sweetest revenge. Becoming less externally controlled by the words of others is not wilting in the face of a bully (or, more likely, just an ass)--quite the opposite.
  • Posted by Graduate Student on February 20, 2011 at 10:45am UTC
  • It's interesting how gender played out in this conversation. If it was me and it was effecting me this much, at the least I would begin looking at jobs else where. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you can't be mobile! Being mobile is not something just for men!
  • Posted by Math Prof on February 21, 2011 at 9:30am UTC
  • It is easier than you think. Hit back, but also lighten up a bit. Say things, in a semi-playful tone, like (say his name is John): Gosh John, that was a really great memo you wrote the other day! John, you handled that meeting really well - I am darn proud of you! Say John, could you get me a cup of coffee? Two sugars, no cream. You are such dear.

    He may or may not "figure it out." But either way, you'll at least have a little fun. That's what he is doing.

  • Some Possibilities
  • Posted by Suck It Up , Loser at MSU on February 21, 2011 at 4:45pm UTC
  • On reading the female's complaints, two possibilities come to mind. (1) He could resist your ideas because they are bad. (2) You may be a failure at that supposed female skill, mind reading, and be misinterpreting his intentions.
  • come and go
  • Posted by sheridan on February 21, 2011 at 11:30pm UTC
  • We get this all the time on the Indian Reservations. "I did this" "I did that" "I was in charge of this". We always roll our eyes of course back in the classroom and laugh and say, "well, what are they doing out at this remote location if they were superman or superwoman?" Then we laugh, laugh, laugh.